Case study · Updated 2026-05-12
ApexGEO's self-audit
The platform measures itself. Real baseline, real Phase 2 fixes, real delta. Snapshot dated 2026-05-12.
The baseline we measured
Before Phase 2 of the marketing-polish work, ApexGEO ran its own score-watcher loop against itself. The platform was a regular customer: 19 prompts seeded, 10 competitors tracked, 6 AI engines monitored.
What Phase 2 changed
- Citation boost (+20) removed from unified-score.ts (PR #185)
- Canonical 10-entry competitor set seeded
- 19 categorized prompts seeded across 5 categories
- loadBrandSignals real implementation shipped (PR #184)
- Industry stats response cache + cron (PR #177)
The delta we observed
GEO score60+8
Visibility88+2
Recommendation22+2
SoV21%+3pp
The Phase 3 hypothesis
Adding /what-is-apexgeo, /compare/* deepening, and /case-studies should lift recognition by 8–15 points over the next two crawl cycles.
How we verify it worked
The platform's score watcher re-baselines after each prompt-tracker cron cycle. The Phase 2 → Phase 3 delta will be a clean A/B: same prompts, same competitors, same engines — only the public content surface changed.